Period Chat
Getting the facts right for the period of your book is just a matter of doing a little research. But getting the dialogue OK is an altogether more iffy business.
The further back you go in time, of course, the problem is eased since it would be a bold linguist (if that’s the right word) who could criticise your choice of words. I’ve long been sceptical of dialogue from a few centuries back but it’s difficult to argue. Shakespeare claims that Caesar, having been punctured by his best mate, said “Et tu, Brute?” but I would have expected something a little more pointed, if you’ll excuse the choice of words, from someone who’d just had a dagger stuck in them.
Legend claims that, William of Orange, whose command of English was decidedly dodgy, shouted from his ship as he was landing at Brixham “Good peoples, I am come for your goods.” To which the reply was, allegedly delivered in broad
But you can get away with dialogue right up until fairly modern times as it cannot be easily questioned. If you’re a writer in the light-hearted vein, the in between the wars period can be handled in the Bertie Woosterish mode, or if in the United States, perhaps a Runyonese style will do. It’s the serious dialogue that presents an almost insoluble problem. How did idle conversation go in, say, the 1920’s. I must confess, I don’t know the answer.
“Who’s for tennis, anyone?” sounds like a good start.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home